Libya vs South Africa: External capital grants
Libya
0 current LCU
in 2011
South Africa
0 current LCU
in 2011
Libya rank
20th
South Africa rank
20th
External capital grants over time
- Libya
- South Africa
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in South Africa, a difference of 0 current LCU.
Across all 52 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 20th of 54 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | — |
| 1970s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | — |
| 1980s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | — |
| 1990s | 0 current LCU | 61.58 million current LCU | 61.58 million current LCU | South Africa |
| 2000s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | — |
| 2010s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external capital grants, Libya or South Africa?
- Libya, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in South Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in external capital grants between Libya and South Africa?
- 0 current LCU, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and South Africa?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
- How do Libya and South Africa rank globally for external capital grants?
- Libya ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 20th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank country economists, published as External capital grants (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grants are unrequited, nonrepayable, noncompulsory receipts of government from other governments or international institutions. In determination of the deficit/surplus, grants are grouped with revenue and expenditure rather than with financing. Values are