Malawi vs Somalia: External capital grants
Malawi
0 current LCU
in 2011
Somalia
0 current LCU
in 2011
Malawi rank
20th
Somalia rank
20th
External capital grants over time
- Malawi
- Somalia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Somalia, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Somalia ahead.
Malawi ranks 20th and Somalia ranks 20th of 54 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | — |
| 1970s | 5.14 million current LCU | 0 current LCU | 5.14 million current LCU | Malawi |
| 1980s | 82.45 million current LCU | 0 current LCU | 82.45 million current LCU | Malawi |
| 1990s | 1.49 billion current LCU | 0 current LCU | 1.49 billion current LCU | Malawi |
| 2000s | 31.63 billion current LCU | 0 current LCU | 31.63 billion current LCU | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external capital grants, Malawi or Somalia?
- Malawi, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Somalia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in external capital grants between Malawi and Somalia?
- 0 current LCU, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Somalia?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Somalia rank globally for external capital grants?
- Malawi ranks 20th and Somalia ranks 20th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank country economists, published as External capital grants (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grants are unrequited, nonrepayable, noncompulsory receipts of government from other governments or international institutions. In determination of the deficit/surplus, grants are grouped with revenue and expenditure rather than with financing. Values are