Karlsruhe vs Latvia: High-tech patent applications to the EPO by priority year and NUTS 3
Karlsruhe
219.65
in 2012
Latvia
7.33
in 2012
Karlsruhe rank
24th
Latvia rank
22nd
High-tech patent applications to the EPO by priority year and NUTS 3 over time
- Karlsruhe
- Latvia
How they compare
Karlsruhe currently reports 219.65 against 7.33 in Latvia, a difference of 212.32.
That makes Karlsruhe's figure about 30.0 times Latvia's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Karlsruhe has been ahead every year.
Karlsruhe ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 22nd of 1415 regions.
Karlsruhe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Karlsruhe | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83.75 | 0.2833 | 83.46 | Karlsruhe |
| 2000s | 204.14 | 1.47 | 202.67 | Karlsruhe |
| 2010s | 224.24 | 3.36 | 220.88 | Karlsruhe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher high-tech patent applications to the epo by priority year and nuts 3, Karlsruhe or Latvia?
- Karlsruhe, at 219.65 against 7.33 in Latvia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in high-tech patent applications to the epo by priority year and nuts 3 between Karlsruhe and Latvia?
- 212.32, with Karlsruhe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Karlsruhe and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2012.
- How do Karlsruhe and Latvia rank globally for high-tech patent applications to the epo by priority year and nuts 3?
- Karlsruhe ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 22nd of 1415 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as High-tech patent applications to the EPO by priority year and NUTS 3 region (1977-2012). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.