Latvia vs Stuttgart: High-tech patent applications to the EPO by priority year … NUTS
Latvia
7.33 Number
in 2012
Stuttgart
186.16 Number
in 2012
Latvia rank
27th
Stuttgart rank
30th
High-tech patent applications to the EPO by priority year … NUTS over time
- Latvia
- Stuttgart
How they compare
Stuttgart currently reports 186.16 Number against 7.33 Number in Latvia, a difference of 178.83 Number.
That makes Stuttgart's figure about 25.4 times Latvia's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Stuttgart has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 27th and Stuttgart ranks 30th of 41 countries.
Stuttgart has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Stuttgart | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2833 Number | 210.19 Number | 209.9 Number | Stuttgart |
| 2000s | 1.47 Number | 328.96 Number | 327.48 Number | Stuttgart |
| 2010s | 3.36 Number | 204.21 Number | 200.85 Number | Stuttgart |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher high-tech patent applications to the epo by priority year and nuts 3, Latvia or Stuttgart?
- Stuttgart, at 186.16 Number against 7.33 Number in Latvia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in high-tech patent applications to the epo by priority year and nuts 3 between Latvia and Stuttgart?
- 178.83 Number, with Stuttgart ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Stuttgart?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2012.
- How do Latvia and Stuttgart rank globally for high-tech patent applications to the epo by priority year and nuts 3?
- Latvia ranks 27th and Stuttgart ranks 30th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as High-tech patent applications to the EPO by priority year and NUTS 3 region (1977-2012). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.