Lithuania vs Vlaams Gewest: High-tech patent applications to the EPO by priority year and NUTS 3
Lithuania
12.2
in 2012
Vlaams Gewest
250
in 2012
Lithuania rank
20th
Vlaams Gewest rank
18th
High-tech patent applications to the EPO by priority year and NUTS 3 over time
- Lithuania
- Vlaams Gewest
How they compare
Vlaams Gewest currently reports 250 against 12.2 in Lithuania, a difference of 237.8.
That makes Vlaams Gewest's figure about 20.5 times Lithuania's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Vlaams Gewest has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 20th and Vlaams Gewest ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Vlaams Gewest has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Vlaams Gewest | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9825 | 142.07 | 141.09 | Vlaams Gewest |
| 2000s | 2.55 | 239.99 | 237.45 | Vlaams Gewest |
| 2010s | 6.57 | 230.24 | 223.67 | Vlaams Gewest |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher high-tech patent applications to the epo by priority year and nuts 3, Lithuania or Vlaams Gewest?
- Vlaams Gewest, at 250 against 12.2 in Lithuania as of 2012.
- What is the difference in high-tech patent applications to the epo by priority year and nuts 3 between Lithuania and Vlaams Gewest?
- 237.8, with Vlaams Gewest ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Vlaams Gewest?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2012.
- How do Lithuania and Vlaams Gewest rank globally for high-tech patent applications to the epo by priority year and nuts 3?
- Lithuania ranks 20th and Vlaams Gewest ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as High-tech patent applications to the EPO by priority year and NUTS 3 region (1977-2012). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.