Ethiopia vs South Africa: Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge

Ethiopia
169.1 current LCU
in 2009
South Africa
149 current LCU
in 2009
Ethiopia rank
32nd
South Africa rank
33rd

Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge over time

  • Ethiopia
  • South Africa
0200400600800196019842009

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 169.1 current LCU against 149 current LCU in South Africa, a difference of 20.1 current LCU.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1960 it was South Africa ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 32nd and South Africa ranks 33rd of 53 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU 0 current LCU 0 current LCU β€”
1970s 0 current LCU 0 current LCU 0 current LCU β€”
1980s 0 current LCU 0 current LCU 0 current LCU β€”
1990s 108.6 current LCU 91.58 current LCU 17.02 current LCU Ethiopia
2000s 551.12 current LCU 131.22 current LCU 419.9 current LCU Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mobile cellular postpaid connection charge, Ethiopia or South Africa?
Ethiopia, at 169.1 current LCU against 149 current LCU in South Africa as of 2009.
What is the difference in mobile cellular postpaid connection charge between Ethiopia and South Africa?
20.1 current LCU, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and South Africa?
32 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2009.
How do Ethiopia and South Africa rank globally for mobile cellular postpaid connection charge?
Ethiopia ranks 32nd and South Africa ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs South Africa: Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge. Statizoid, drawing on International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-postpaid-connection-charge-current-lcu/ethiopia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-postpaid-connection-charge-current-lcu/ethiopia/south-africa/">Ethiopia vs South Africa: Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 1,710 data points, 1960–2010
Last refreshed

Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. The initial, one-time charge for a new postpaid subscription. Refundable deposits should not be counted. Although some operators waive the connection charge, this does not include the cost of the Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) card. The price of the SIM card should be included in the connection charge. It should also be noted if free minutes or free SMS are included in the connection charge. Taxes should be included. If not included, it should be specified in a note including the tax rate applicable. This indicator is expressed in local currency.