Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge

Sao Tome and Principe
8.64 current US$
in 2009
Zimbabwe
9 current US$
in 2000
Sao Tome and Principe rank
13th
Zimbabwe rank
12th

Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Zimbabwe
0204060196019842009

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 9 current US$ against 8.64 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.36 current US$.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 53 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$ β€”
1970s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$ β€”
1980s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$ β€”
1990s 0 current US$ 9.35 current US$ 9.35 current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 0 current US$ 9 current US$ 9 current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mobile cellular postpaid connection charge, Sao Tome and Principe or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 9 current US$ against 8.64 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2000.
What is the difference in mobile cellular postpaid connection charge between Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
0.36 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2000.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe rank globally for mobile cellular postpaid connection charge?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge. Statizoid, drawing on International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-postpaid-connection-charge-current-us/sao-tome-and-principe/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-postpaid-connection-charge-current-us/sao-tome-and-principe/zimbabwe/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mobile cellular postpaid connection charge (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 1,863 data points, 1960–2010
Last refreshed

Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. The initial, one-time charge for a new postpaid subscription. Refundable deposits should not be counted. Although some operators waive the connection charge, this does not include the cost of the Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) card. The price of the SIM card should be included in the connection charge. It should also be noted if free minutes or free SMS are included in the connection charge. Taxes should be included. If not included, it should be specified in a note including the tax rate applicable. This indicator is expressed in local currency.