Low income vs Tuvalu: Patent applications, nonresidents, per capita
Low income
0 units per person
in 2024
Tuvalu
0.0009 units per person
in 2022
Low income rank
11th
Tuvalu rank
9th
Patent applications, nonresidents, per capita over time
- Low income
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 0.0009 units per person against 0 units per person in Low income, a difference of 0.0009 units per person.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 582.7 times Low income's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 11th and Tuvalu ranks 9th of 11 groups.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0.0008 units per person | 0.0008 units per person | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0.001 units per person | 0.001 units per person | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent applications, nonresidents, per capita, Low income or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 0.0009 units per person against 0 units per person in Low income as of 2022.
- What is the difference in patent applications, nonresidents, per capita between Low income and Tuvalu?
- 0.0009 units per person, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Tuvalu?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Low income and Tuvalu rank globally for patent applications, nonresidents, per capita?
- Low income ranks 11th and Tuvalu ranks 9th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Patent applications, nonresidents, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Patent applications, nonresidents divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.