Eswatini vs Italy: Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP
Eswatini
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Italy
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini rank
108th
Italy rank
110th
Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP over time
- Eswatini
- Italy
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Italy, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 108th and Italy ranks 110th of 156 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Italy?
- Eswatini, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Italy as of 2015.
- What is the difference in patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Italy?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Italy?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Italy rank globally for patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp?
- Eswatini ranks 108th and Italy ranks 110th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Patent applications, nonresidents divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.