Eswatini vs Malta: Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP
Eswatini
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Malta
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini rank
108th
Malta rank
107th
Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP over time
- Eswatini
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 108th and Malta ranks 107th of 156 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Malta?
- Malta, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Malta?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Malta?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2015.
- How do Eswatini and Malta rank globally for patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp?
- Eswatini ranks 108th and Malta ranks 107th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Patent applications, nonresidents divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.