Gambia vs Hong Kong: Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP
Gambia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Hong Kong
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Gambia rank
3rd
Hong Kong rank
5th
Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP over time
- Gambia
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 3rd and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 156 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp, Gambia or Hong Kong?
- Gambia, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong as of 2022.
- What is the difference in patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp between Gambia and Hong Kong?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Hong Kong?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Gambia and Hong Kong rank globally for patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp?
- Gambia ranks 3rd and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Patent applications, nonresidents divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.