Gambia vs South Korea: Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP
Gambia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
South Korea
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Gambia rank
3rd
South Korea rank
6th
Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP over time
- Gambia
- South Korea
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in South Korea, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.5 times South Korea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2015 it was South Korea ahead.
Gambia ranks 3rd and South Korea ranks 6th of 156 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | South Korea |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp, Gambia or South Korea?
- Gambia, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in South Korea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp between Gambia and South Korea?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and South Korea?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Gambia and South Korea rank globally for patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp?
- Gambia ranks 3rd and South Korea ranks 6th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Patent applications, nonresidents divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.