Lithuania vs Tanzania: Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP
Lithuania
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tanzania
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Lithuania rank
153rd
Tanzania rank
155th
Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP over time
- Lithuania
- Tanzania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 2.8 times Tanzania's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 153rd and Tanzania ranks 155th of 156 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp, Lithuania or Tanzania?
- Lithuania, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Tanzania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp between Lithuania and Tanzania?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Tanzania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Lithuania and Tanzania rank globally for patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp?
- Lithuania ranks 153rd and Tanzania ranks 155th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Patent applications, nonresidents divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.