Malta vs Namibia: Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP
Malta
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Namibia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malta rank
107th
Namibia rank
104th
Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Malta, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 107th and Namibia ranks 104th of 156 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp, Malta or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp between Malta and Namibia?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of gdp?
- Malta ranks 107th and Namibia ranks 104th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Patent applications, nonresidents, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Patent applications, nonresidents divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.