Freiburg vs Latvia: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region
Freiburg
811.41 Number
in 2012
Latvia
24.57 Number
in 2012
Freiburg rank
30th
Latvia rank
33rd
Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region over time
- Freiburg
- Latvia
How they compare
Freiburg currently reports 811.41 Number against 24.57 Number in Latvia, a difference of 786.84 Number.
That makes Freiburg's figure about 33.0 times Latvia's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Freiburg has been ahead every year.
Freiburg ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 33rd of 1662 regions.
Freiburg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Freiburg | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 608.51 Number | 1.88 Number | 606.63 Number | Freiburg |
| 2000s | 1,005 Number | 12.95 Number | 992.42 Number | Freiburg |
| 2010s | 882.8 Number | 19.41 Number | 863.39 Number | Freiburg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region, Freiburg or Latvia?
- Freiburg, at 811.41 Number against 24.57 Number in Latvia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region between Freiburg and Latvia?
- 786.84 Number, with Freiburg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Freiburg and Latvia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2012.
- How do Freiburg and Latvia rank globally for patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region?
- Freiburg ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 33rd of 1662 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region (1977-2012). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.