Latvia vs München, Kreisfreie Stadt: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region

Latvia
24.57 Number
in 2012
München, Kreisfreie Stadt
710.75 Number
in 2012
Latvia rank
33rd
München, Kreisfreie Stadt rank
35th

Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region over time

  • Latvia
  • München, Kreisfreie Stadt
02505007501.0k197719942012

How they compare

München, Kreisfreie Stadt currently reports 710.75 Number against 24.57 Number in Latvia, a difference of 686.18 Number.

That makes München, Kreisfreie Stadt's figure about 28.9 times Latvia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, München, Kreisfreie Stadt has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 33rd and München, Kreisfreie Stadt ranks 35th of 41 countries.

München, Kreisfreie Stadt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia München, Kreisfreie Stadt Difference Ahead
1990s 1.88 Number 595.94 Number 594.07 Number München, Kreisfreie Stadt
2000s 12.95 Number 864.05 Number 851.1 Number München, Kreisfreie Stadt
2010s 19.41 Number 798.45 Number 779.04 Number München, Kreisfreie Stadt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region, Latvia or München, Kreisfreie Stadt?
München, Kreisfreie Stadt, at 710.75 Number against 24.57 Number in Latvia as of 2012.
What is the difference in patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region between Latvia and München, Kreisfreie Stadt?
686.18 Number, with München, Kreisfreie Stadt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and München, Kreisfreie Stadt?
21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2012.
How do Latvia and München, Kreisfreie Stadt rank globally for patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region?
Latvia ranks 33rd and München, Kreisfreie Stadt ranks 35th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region (1977-2012). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs München, Kreisfreie Stadt: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-applications-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by-nuts-3-region-1977-2012/latvia/munchen-kreisfreie-stadt/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-applications-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by-nuts-3-region-1977-2012/latvia/munchen-kreisfreie-stadt/">Latvia vs München, Kreisfreie Stadt: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region (1977-2012)
Unit
Number
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
1,675 places, 49,904 data points, 1977–2012
Last refreshed