Netherlands vs Stuttgart: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region
Netherlands
2,644 Number
in 2012
Stuttgart
1,730 Number
in 2012
Netherlands rank
6th
Stuttgart rank
7th
Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region over time
- Netherlands
- Stuttgart
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 2,644 Number against 1,730 Number in Stuttgart, a difference of 914 Number.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.5 times Stuttgart's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
Netherlands ranks 6th and Stuttgart ranks 7th of 41 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Stuttgart | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 298.96 Number | 167.86 Number | 131.1 Number | Netherlands |
| 1980s | 1,162 Number | 730.12 Number | 431.4 Number | Netherlands |
| 1990s | 1,926 Number | 1,486 Number | 439.92 Number | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 3,555 Number | 2,591 Number | 964.19 Number | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 3,036 Number | 2,212 Number | 823.58 Number | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region, Netherlands or Stuttgart?
- Netherlands, at 2,644 Number against 1,730 Number in Stuttgart as of 2012.
- What is the difference in patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region between Netherlands and Stuttgart?
- 914 Number, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Stuttgart?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2012.
- How do Netherlands and Stuttgart rank globally for patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region?
- Netherlands ranks 6th and Stuttgart ranks 7th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region (1977-2012). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.