Colombia vs South Korea: Annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies
Colombia
1 patents
in 2025
South Korea
1 patents
in 2025
Colombia rank
32nd
South Korea rank
32nd
Annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies over time
- Colombia
- South Korea
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 1 patents against 1 patents in South Korea, a difference of 0 patents.
Across all 16 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 32nd and South Korea ranks 32nd of 55 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 patents | 20 patents | 19 patents | South Korea |
| 2010s | 2.44 patents | 155.22 patents | 152.78 patents | South Korea |
| 2020s | 1.83 patents | 170 patents | 168.17 patents | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies, Colombia or South Korea?
- Colombia, at 1 patents against 1 patents in South Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies between Colombia and South Korea?
- 0 patents, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and South Korea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and South Korea rank globally for annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies?
- Colombia ranks 32nd and South Korea ranks 32nd of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IRENA – INSPIRE Platform (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Figures in recent years are subject to a time lag; submitted patents may not yet be reflected in the data.