New Zealand vs San Marino: Annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies
New Zealand
1 patents
in 2022
San Marino
1 patents
in 2018
New Zealand rank
32nd
San Marino rank
32nd
Annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies over time
- New Zealand
- San Marino
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1 patents against 1 patents in San Marino, a difference of 0 patents.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 32nd and San Marino ranks 32nd of 55 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8 patents | 1 patents | 7 patents | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 3.25 patents | 1 patents | 2.25 patents | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies, New Zealand or San Marino?
- New Zealand, at 1 patents against 1 patents in San Marino as of 2022.
- What is the difference in annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies between New Zealand and San Marino?
- 0 patents, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and San Marino rank globally for annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies?
- New Zealand ranks 32nd and San Marino ranks 32nd of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IRENA – INSPIRE Platform (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Figures in recent years are subject to a time lag; submitted patents may not yet be reflected in the data.