Congo vs Côte d’Ivoire: Population coverage of mobile cellular telephony
Population coverage of mobile cellular telephony over time
- Congo
- Côte d’Ivoire
How they compare
Congo currently reports 95.0% against 92.1% in Côte d’Ivoire, a difference of 2.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
Congo ranks 13th and Côte d’Ivoire ranks 16th of 40 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Côte d’Ivoire in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Côte d’Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.3% | 59.6% | 20.3% | Côte d’Ivoire |
| 2010s | 94.0% | 92.1% | 1.9% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population coverage of mobile cellular telephony, Congo or Côte d’Ivoire?
- Congo, at 95.0% against 92.1% in Côte d’Ivoire as of 2011.
- What is the difference in population coverage of mobile cellular telephony between Congo and Côte d’Ivoire?
- 2.9%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Côte d’Ivoire?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Congo and Côte d’Ivoire rank globally for population coverage of mobile cellular telephony?
- Congo ranks 13th and Côte d’Ivoire ranks 16th of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Population coverage of mobile cellular telephony (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Percentage of population covered by mobile cellular telephony refers to the percentage of a country’s inhabitants that live within areas served by a mobile cellular signal, irrespective of whether or not they choose to use it. This should not be confused with the percentage of the land area covered by a mobile cellular signal or the percentage of the population that subscribe to mobile cellular service. Note that this measures the theoretical ability to use mobile cellular services if one has a cellular telephone and a subscription.