Côte d'Ivoire vs Eswatini: Population coverage of mobile cellular telephony
Population coverage of mobile cellular telephony over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 94.9% against 92.1% in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 2.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 16th and Eswatini ranks 15th of 40 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.0% | 81.0% | 24.0% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 92.1% | 93.5% | 1.4% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population coverage of mobile cellular telephony, Côte d'Ivoire or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 94.9% against 92.1% in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2011.
- What is the difference in population coverage of mobile cellular telephony between Côte d'Ivoire and Eswatini?
- 2.8%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Eswatini?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Eswatini rank globally for population coverage of mobile cellular telephony?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 16th and Eswatini ranks 15th of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Population coverage of mobile cellular telephony (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Percentage of population covered by mobile cellular telephony refers to the percentage of a country’s inhabitants that live within areas served by a mobile cellular signal, irrespective of whether or not they choose to use it. This should not be confused with the percentage of the land area covered by a mobile cellular signal or the percentage of the population that subscribe to mobile cellular service. Note that this measures the theoretical ability to use mobile cellular services if one has a cellular telephone and a subscription.