Barbados vs Faroe Islands: Proportion of population covered by at least a 2G mobile network
Barbados
100.0%
in 2022
Faroe Islands
100.0%
in 2022
Barbados rank
1st
Faroe Islands rank
1st
Proportion of population covered by at least a 2G mobile network over time
- Barbados
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Barbados ranks 1st and Faroe Islands ranks 1st of 196 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Faroe Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.5% | 99.5% | 2.0% | Faroe Islands |
| 2010s | 99.7% | 99.4% | 0.3% | Barbados |
| 2020s | 99.9% | 100.0% | 0.1% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population covered by at least a 2g mobile network, Barbados or Faroe Islands?
- Barbados, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Faroe Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in proportion of population covered by at least a 2g mobile network between Barbados and Faroe Islands?
- 0.0%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Faroe Islands?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Barbados and Faroe Islands rank globally for proportion of population covered by at least a 2g mobile network?
- Barbados ranks 1st and Faroe Islands ranks 1st of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of population covered by at least a 2G mobile network (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.