Cape Verde vs Eswatini: Public payphones
Public payphones over time
- Cape Verde
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1.4 per 1,000 people against 1.15 per 1,000 people in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.25 per 1,000 people.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 15th and Eswatini ranks 12th of 51 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6536 per 1,000 people | 0.5475 per 1,000 people | 0.1061 per 1,000 people | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0.9688 per 1,000 people | 1.24 per 1,000 people | 0.2732 per 1,000 people | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher public payphones, Cape Verde or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 1.4 per 1,000 people against 1.15 per 1,000 people in Cape Verde as of 2009.
- What is the difference in public payphones between Cape Verde and Eswatini?
- 0.25 per 1,000 people, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Eswatini?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2008.
- How do Cape Verde and Eswatini rank globally for public payphones?
- Cape Verde ranks 15th and Eswatini ranks 12th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Public payphones (per 1,000 people). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Total number of all types of public telephones, including coin- and card-operated and public telephones in call offices. Publicly available phones installed in private places should also be included, as should mobile public telephones. All public telephones regardless of capability (e.g., local calls or national only) should be counted. If the national definition of "payphone" differs from that above (e.g., by excluding pay phones in private places), then respondents should indicate their own definition.