Eswatini vs Mauritius: Public payphones
Public payphones over time
- Eswatini
- Mauritius
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1.4 per 1,000 people against 1.18 per 1,000 people in Mauritius, a difference of 0.22 per 1,000 people.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 12th and Mauritius ranks 14th of 51 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4811 per 1,000 people | 0.9271 per 1,000 people | 0.446 per 1,000 people | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1.24 per 1,000 people | 1.61 per 1,000 people | 0.373 per 1,000 people | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher public payphones, Eswatini or Mauritius?
- Eswatini, at 1.4 per 1,000 people against 1.18 per 1,000 people in Mauritius as of 2009.
- What is the difference in public payphones between Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 0.22 per 1,000 people, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Eswatini and Mauritius rank globally for public payphones?
- Eswatini ranks 12th and Mauritius ranks 14th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Public payphones (per 1,000 people). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Total number of all types of public telephones, including coin- and card-operated and public telephones in call offices. Publicly available phones installed in private places should also be included, as should mobile public telephones. All public telephones regardless of capability (e.g., local calls or national only) should be counted. If the national definition of "payphone" differs from that above (e.g., by excluding pay phones in private places), then respondents should indicate their own definition.