Eswatini vs Mauritius: Public payphones
Public payphones over time
- Eswatini
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1,503 against 1,462 in Eswatini, a difference of 41.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 31st and Mauritius ranks 30th of 51 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 467.6 | 1,063 | 595.3 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1,265 | 1,974 | 708.57 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher public payphones, Eswatini or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 1,503 against 1,462 in Eswatini as of 2009.
- What is the difference in public payphones between Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 41, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Eswatini and Mauritius rank globally for public payphones?
- Eswatini ranks 31st and Mauritius ranks 30th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Public payphones. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Total number of all types of public telephones, including coin- and card-operated and public telephones in call offices. Publicly available phones installed in private places should also be included, as should mobile public telephones. All public telephones regardless of capability (e.g., local calls or national only) should be counted. If the national definition of "payphone" differs from that above (e.g., by excluding pay phones in private places), then respondents should indicate their own definition.