Algeria vs Cape Verde: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Algeria
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 392.4 current LCU against 150 current LCU in Algeria, a difference of 242.4 current LCU.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 2.6 times Algeria's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 34th and Cape Verde ranks 32nd of 52 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 113.33 current LCU | 250 current LCU | 136.67 current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 170 current LCU | 268.95 current LCU | 98.95 current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 150 current LCU | 392.4 current LCU | 242.4 current LCU | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Algeria or Cape Verde?
- Cape Verde, at 392.4 current LCU against 150 current LCU in Algeria as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Algeria and Cape Verde?
- 242.4 current LCU, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Cape Verde?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Algeria and Cape Verde rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Algeria ranks 34th and Cape Verde ranks 32nd of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.