Angola vs Kenya: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Angola
- Kenya
How they compare
Angola currently reports 945 current LCU against 580 current LCU in Kenya, a difference of 365 current LCU.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.6 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kenya ahead.
Angola ranks 29th and Kenya ranks 31st of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.18 current LCU | 237.43 current LCU | 231.25 current LCU | Kenya |
| 2000s | 620 current LCU | 498.8 current LCU | 121.2 current LCU | Angola |
| 2010s | 922.5 current LCU | 580 current LCU | 342.5 current LCU | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Angola or Kenya?
- Angola, at 945 current LCU against 580 current LCU in Kenya as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Angola and Kenya?
- 365 current LCU, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Kenya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Angola and Kenya rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Angola ranks 29th and Kenya ranks 31st of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.