Angola vs Malawi: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Angola
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 1,048 current LCU against 945 current LCU in Angola, a difference of 103 current LCU.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Angola ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 27th of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.33 current LCU | 53.7 current LCU | 49.37 current LCU | Malawi |
| 2000s | 433.33 current LCU | 100 current LCU | 333.33 current LCU | Angola |
| 2010s | 922.5 current LCU | 574.25 current LCU | 348.25 current LCU | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Angola or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 1,048 current LCU against 945 current LCU in Angola as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Angola and Malawi?
- 103 current LCU, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Malawi?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Angola and Malawi rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Angola ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 27th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.