Benin vs Mali: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Benin
- Mali
How they compare
Benin currently reports 2,700 current LCU against 2,325 current LCU in Mali, a difference of 375 current LCU.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 18th and Mali ranks 21st of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 2 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,348 current LCU | 1,759 current LCU | 589.06 current LCU | Benin |
| 2000s | 2,759 current LCU | 3,438 current LCU | 679 current LCU | Mali |
| 2010s | 2,700 current LCU | 2,490 current LCU | 210 current LCU | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Benin or Mali?
- Benin, at 2,700 current LCU against 2,325 current LCU in Mali as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Benin and Mali?
- 375 current LCU, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Mali?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Benin and Mali rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Benin ranks 18th and Mali ranks 21st of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.