Burundi vs Cape Verde: Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU)
Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU) over time
- Burundi
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 944 current LCU against 392.4 current LCU in Cape Verde, a difference of 551.6 current LCU.
That makes Burundi's figure about 2.4 times Cape Verde's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 30th and Cape Verde ranks 32nd of 52 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 430 current LCU | 250 current LCU | 180 current LCU | Burundi |
| 2000s | 420 current LCU | 270.34 current LCU | 149.66 current LCU | Burundi |
| 2010s | 944 current LCU | 392.4 current LCU | 551.6 current LCU | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Burundi or Cape Verde?
- Burundi, at 944 current LCU against 392.4 current LCU in Cape Verde as of 2010.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Burundi and Cape Verde?
- 551.6 current LCU, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Cape Verde?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
- How do Burundi and Cape Verde rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Burundi ranks 30th and Cape Verde ranks 32nd of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.