Burundi vs Djibouti: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Burundi
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 1,000 current LCU against 944 current LCU in Burundi, a difference of 56 current LCU.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Djibouti has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 30th and Djibouti ranks 28th of 52 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 432 current LCU | 3,500 current LCU | 3,068 current LCU | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 420 current LCU | 2,071 current LCU | 1,651 current LCU | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 944 current LCU | 1,000 current LCU | 56 current LCU | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Burundi or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at 1,000 current LCU against 944 current LCU in Burundi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Burundi and Djibouti?
- 56 current LCU, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Djibouti?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Burundi and Djibouti rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Burundi ranks 30th and Djibouti ranks 28th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.