Cape Verde vs Kenya: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Cape Verde
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 580 current LCU against 392.4 current LCU in Cape Verde, a difference of 187.6 current LCU.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.5 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 32nd and Kenya ranks 31st of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Kenya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 250 current LCU | 237.43 current LCU | 12.57 current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 268.95 current LCU | 506.8 current LCU | 237.85 current LCU | Kenya |
| 2010s | 392.4 current LCU | 580 current LCU | 187.6 current LCU | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Cape Verde or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 580 current LCU against 392.4 current LCU in Cape Verde as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Cape Verde and Kenya?
- 187.6 current LCU, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Kenya?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Kenya rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Cape Verde ranks 32nd and Kenya ranks 31st of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.