Cameroon vs Uganda: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Cameroon
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 12,300 current LCU against 10,000 current LCU in Cameroon, a difference of 2,300 current LCU.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 7th and Uganda ranks 6th of 52 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,792 current LCU | 8,750 current LCU | 6,958 current LCU | Uganda |
| 2000s | 2,856 current LCU | 10,000 current LCU | 7,144 current LCU | Uganda |
| 2010s | 6,789 current LCU | 12,300 current LCU | 5,511 current LCU | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Cameroon or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 12,300 current LCU against 10,000 current LCU in Cameroon as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Cameroon and Uganda?
- 2,300 current LCU, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Uganda?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2011.
- How do Cameroon and Uganda rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Cameroon ranks 7th and Uganda ranks 6th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.