Chad vs Togo: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Chad
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 4,425 current LCU against 3,000 current LCU in Chad, a difference of 1,425 current LCU.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.5 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 15th and Togo ranks 12th of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,796 current LCU | 1,580 current LCU | 2,216 current LCU | Chad |
| 2000s | 3,466 current LCU | 3,882 current LCU | 415.7 current LCU | Togo |
| 2010s | 3,000 current LCU | 4,425 current LCU | 1,425 current LCU | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Chad or Togo?
- Togo, at 4,425 current LCU against 3,000 current LCU in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Chad and Togo?
- 1,425 current LCU, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Togo?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Chad and Togo rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Chad ranks 15th and Togo ranks 12th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.