Comoros vs Nigeria: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Comoros
- Nigeria
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 2,250 current LCU against 1,300 current LCU in Nigeria, a difference of 950 current LCU.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.7 times Nigeria's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 22nd and Nigeria ranks 25th of 52 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,125 current LCU | 50 current LCU | 2,075 current LCU | Comoros |
| 2000s | 2,250 current LCU | 485 current LCU | 1,765 current LCU | Comoros |
| 2010s | 2,250 current LCU | 1,300 current LCU | 950 current LCU | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Comoros or Nigeria?
- Comoros, at 2,250 current LCU against 1,300 current LCU in Nigeria as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Comoros and Nigeria?
- 950 current LCU, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Nigeria?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Comoros and Nigeria rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Comoros ranks 22nd and Nigeria ranks 25th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.