Comoros vs Senegal: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Comoros
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 2,415 current LCU against 2,250 current LCU in Comoros, a difference of 165 current LCU.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 22nd and Senegal ranks 19th of 52 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,156 current LCU | 2,237 current LCU | 81.19 current LCU | Senegal |
| 2000s | 2,250 current LCU | 2,624 current LCU | 373.5 current LCU | Senegal |
| 2010s | 2,250 current LCU | 2,415 current LCU | 165 current LCU | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Comoros or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 2,415 current LCU against 2,250 current LCU in Comoros as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Comoros and Senegal?
- 165 current LCU, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Senegal?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Comoros and Senegal rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Comoros ranks 22nd and Senegal ranks 19th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.