Congo vs Tanzania: Residential monthly telephone subscription

Congo
7,140 current LCU
in 1994
Tanzania
6,400 current LCU
in 2011
Congo rank
8th
Tanzania rank
10th

Residential monthly telephone subscription over time

  • Congo
  • Tanzania
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020002011

How they compare

Congo currently reports 7,140 current LCU against 6,400 current LCU in Tanzania, a difference of 740 current LCU.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 8th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 52 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Congo or Tanzania?
Congo, at 7,140 current LCU against 6,400 current LCU in Tanzania as of 1994.
What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Congo and Tanzania?
740 current LCU, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tanzania?
5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1994.
How do Congo and Tanzania rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
Congo ranks 8th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
52 places, 975 data points, 1982–2011
Last refreshed

Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.