Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Residential monthly telephone subscription

Côte d'Ivoire
7,080 current LCU
in 2011
Tanzania, United Republic of
6,400 current LCU
in 2011
Côte d'Ivoire rank
9th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
10th

Residential monthly telephone subscription over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k198619982011

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 7,080 current LCU against 6,400 current LCU in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 680 current LCU.

That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 9th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 10th of 52 countries.

Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 3,314 current LCU 2,056 current LCU 1,258 current LCU Côte d'Ivoire
2000s 5,826 current LCU 4,554 current LCU 1,272 current LCU Côte d'Ivoire
2010s 7,080 current LCU 6,400 current LCU 680 current LCU Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Côte d'Ivoire or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 7,080 current LCU against 6,400 current LCU in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2011.
What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
680 current LCU, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 9th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 10th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Residential monthly telephone subscription. Statizoid, drawing on International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/residential-monthly-telephone-subscription-current-lcu/cote-d-ivoire/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/residential-monthly-telephone-subscription-current-lcu/cote-d-ivoire/tanzania/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Residential monthly telephone subscription</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
52 places, 975 data points, 1982–2011
Last refreshed

Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.