Djibouti vs Nigeria: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Djibouti
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 1,300 current LCU against 1,000 current LCU in Djibouti, a difference of 300 current LCU.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.3 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 28th and Nigeria ranks 25th of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,500 current LCU | 47 current LCU | 3,453 current LCU | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 1,750 current LCU | 485 current LCU | 1,265 current LCU | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 1,000 current LCU | 1,300 current LCU | 300 current LCU | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Djibouti or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 1,300 current LCU against 1,000 current LCU in Djibouti as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Djibouti and Nigeria?
- 300 current LCU, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Nigeria?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Djibouti and Nigeria rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Djibouti ranks 28th and Nigeria ranks 25th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.