Djibouti vs Rwanda: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Djibouti
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1,180 current LCU against 1,000 current LCU in Djibouti, a difference of 180 current LCU.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 28th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,500 current LCU | 500 current LCU | 3,000 current LCU | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 1,750 current LCU | 968 current LCU | 782 current LCU | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 1,000 current LCU | 1,180 current LCU | 180 current LCU | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Djibouti or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 1,180 current LCU against 1,000 current LCU in Djibouti as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Djibouti and Rwanda?
- 180 current LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Djibouti and Rwanda rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Djibouti ranks 28th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.