Egypt vs Morocco: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Egypt
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 19 current LCU against 13.2 current LCU in Egypt, a difference of 5.8 current LCU.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.4 times Egypt's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 46th and Morocco ranks 45th of 52 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.75 current LCU | 43.89 current LCU | 40.14 current LCU | Morocco |
| 2000s | 7.95 current LCU | 100.8 current LCU | 92.85 current LCU | Morocco |
| 2010s | 13.2 current LCU | 69.5 current LCU | 56.3 current LCU | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Egypt or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 19 current LCU against 13.2 current LCU in Egypt as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Egypt and Morocco?
- 5.8 current LCU, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Morocco?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Egypt and Morocco rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Egypt ranks 46th and Morocco ranks 45th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.