Eritrea vs Lesotho: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Eritrea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 50 current LCU against 44 current LCU in Eritrea, a difference of 6 current LCU.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lesotho ahead.
Eritrea ranks 41st and Lesotho ranks 40th of 52 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.88 current LCU | 20 current LCU | 0.125 current LCU | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 31.3 current LCU | 45.23 current LCU | 13.93 current LCU | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 44 current LCU | 50 current LCU | 6 current LCU | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Eritrea or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 50 current LCU against 44 current LCU in Eritrea as of 2010.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 6 current LCU, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
- How do Eritrea and Lesotho rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Eritrea ranks 41st and Lesotho ranks 40th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.