Eswatini vs Gambia: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Eswatini
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 36.42 current LCU against 23.5 current LCU in Eswatini, a difference of 12.92 current LCU.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gambia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 43rd and Gambia ranks 42nd of 52 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.68 current LCU | 30.3 current LCU | 20.62 current LCU | Gambia |
| 2000s | 17.36 current LCU | 25 current LCU | 7.64 current LCU | Gambia |
| 2010s | 23.5 current LCU | 36.42 current LCU | 12.92 current LCU | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Eswatini or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 36.42 current LCU against 23.5 current LCU in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Eswatini and Gambia?
- 12.92 current LCU, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Eswatini ranks 43rd and Gambia ranks 42nd of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.