Eswatini vs Morocco: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Eswatini
- Morocco
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 23.5 current LCU against 19 current LCU in Morocco, a difference of 4.5 current LCU.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Morocco ahead.
Eswatini ranks 43rd and Morocco ranks 45th of 52 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.03 current LCU | 43.89 current LCU | 33.86 current LCU | Morocco |
| 2000s | 18.78 current LCU | 100.8 current LCU | 82.02 current LCU | Morocco |
| 2010s | 23.5 current LCU | 69.5 current LCU | 46 current LCU | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Eswatini or Morocco?
- Eswatini, at 23.5 current LCU against 19 current LCU in Morocco as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Eswatini and Morocco?
- 4.5 current LCU, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Morocco?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Morocco rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Eswatini ranks 43rd and Morocco ranks 45th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.