Ethiopia vs Tunisia: Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU)
Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU) over time
- Ethiopia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 9.2 current LCU against 6 current LCU in Tunisia, a difference of 3.2 current LCU.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.5 times Tunisia's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 48th and Tunisia ranks 49th of 52 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.8 current LCU | 2.67 current LCU | 4.13 current LCU | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 8 current LCU | 2.67 current LCU | 5.33 current LCU | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 8.6 current LCU | 4.33 current LCU | 4.26 current LCU | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Ethiopia or Tunisia?
- Ethiopia, at 9.2 current LCU against 6 current LCU in Tunisia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Ethiopia and Tunisia?
- 3.2 current LCU, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Tunisia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Ethiopia and Tunisia rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Ethiopia ranks 48th and Tunisia ranks 49th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.