Gabon vs Madagascar: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Gabon
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 26,000 current LCU against 14,160 current LCU in Gabon, a difference of 11,840 current LCU.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.8 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Madagascar ahead.
Gabon ranks 5th and Madagascar ranks 3rd of 52 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,357 current LCU | 35,857 current LCU | 27,500 current LCU | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 10,075 current LCU | 29,934 current LCU | 19,858 current LCU | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Gabon or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 26,000 current LCU against 14,160 current LCU in Gabon as of 2010.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Gabon and Madagascar?
- 11,840 current LCU, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Madagascar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2008.
- How do Gabon and Madagascar rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Gabon ranks 5th and Madagascar ranks 3rd of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.