Guinea vs Niger: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Guinea
- Niger
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 5,900 current LCU against 3,584 current LCU in Niger, a difference of 2,316 current LCU.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.6 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Niger ahead.
Guinea ranks 11th and Niger ranks 13th of 52 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,055 current LCU | 2,368 current LCU | 686.88 current LCU | Guinea |
| 2000s | 5,900 current LCU | 3,045 current LCU | 2,855 current LCU | Guinea |
| 2010s | 5,900 current LCU | 3,584 current LCU | 2,316 current LCU | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Guinea or Niger?
- Guinea, at 5,900 current LCU against 3,584 current LCU in Niger as of 2010.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Guinea and Niger?
- 2,316 current LCU, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Niger?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Guinea and Niger rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Guinea ranks 11th and Niger ranks 13th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.