Malawi vs Rwanda: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Malawi
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1,180 current LCU against 1,048 current LCU in Malawi, a difference of 132 current LCU.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 52 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90 current LCU | 500 current LCU | 410 current LCU | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 100 current LCU | 928.57 current LCU | 828.57 current LCU | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 574.25 current LCU | 1,180 current LCU | 605.75 current LCU | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Malawi or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 1,180 current LCU against 1,048 current LCU in Malawi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Malawi and Rwanda?
- 132 current LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Rwanda rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Malawi ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.