Mali vs Mauritania: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Mali
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 2,394 current LCU against 2,325 current LCU in Mali, a difference of 69 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 21st and Mauritania ranks 20th of 52 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,677 current LCU | 1,219 current LCU | 458.2 current LCU | Mali |
| 2000s | 3,438 current LCU | 1,439 current LCU | 1,999 current LCU | Mali |
| 2010s | 2,490 current LCU | 2,394 current LCU | 96 current LCU | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Mali or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 2,394 current LCU against 2,325 current LCU in Mali as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Mali and Mauritania?
- 69 current LCU, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Mauritania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Mali and Mauritania rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Mali ranks 21st and Mauritania ranks 20th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.