Mauritius vs Namibia: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 90 current LCU against 71.3 current LCU in Namibia, a difference of 18.7 current LCU.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 36th and Namibia ranks 39th of 52 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60 current LCU | 35.99 current LCU | 24.01 current LCU | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 83.17 current LCU | 50.62 current LCU | 32.55 current LCU | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 90 current LCU | 68.19 current LCU | 21.81 current LCU | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 90 current LCU against 71.3 current LCU in Namibia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 18.7 current LCU, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Mauritius ranks 36th and Namibia ranks 39th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.